 | Andhra Pradesh Discussions Discussions on Andhra Pradesh |
Is Hyderabad fine for the new IIT?
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author | Message |
ved Telugu Veera
Joined: 26 Feb 2006 Posts: 1930
|
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chaitanya wrote: | I was under the impression that even the Andhrites accept that T has been neglected under the united A.P and the proponents of United A argue that they would make sure that there will be equitable distribution from now on !
Also , Hyderabad is not T and T not Hyderabad.Not a single region outside Hyd has not seen any semblance of growth ..venture out of Hyd and would see that for youself. |
There is no reason to doubt that. But if you think entire rural Andhra got benefited because delta area is benefited, it is very akin to saying that T got benefited because Hyderabad got benefited. You step out delta area, you will see the plight of farmers in rest of A/R. In united AP, which I don’t subscribe to anymore in the light of Knagar, we need to have equitable distribution of growth all around the state – Telangana, Andhra, Rayalaseema. |
| | Back to top |
|
 |
Chaitanya Telugu Bidda
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 171 Location: United States (Virginia)
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ved wrote: | | Chaitanya wrote: | I was under the impression that even the Andhrites accept that T has been neglected under the united A.P and the proponents of United A argue that they would make sure that there will be equitable distribution from now on !
Also , Hyderabad is not T and T not Hyderabad.Not a single region outside Hyd has not seen any semblance of growth ..venture out of Hyd and would see that for youself. |
There is no reason to doubt that. But if you think entire rural Andhra got benefited because delta area is benefited, it is very akin to saying that T got benefited because Hyderabad got benefited. You step out delta area, you will see the plight of farmers in rest of A/R. In united AP, which I don’t subscribe to anymore in the light of Knagar, we need to have equitable distribution of growth all around the state – Telangana, Andhra, Rayalaseema. |
Precisely ...I am aware of this .Infact I have stressed this point time and again .The benefactors of a United Andhra are a few (read costal Andhra) but the loosers many ..(read T and UA , I am deliberately putting R out as the case of UA and T are very similar in terns of resources) .
And I agree that there should be equitable distribution of wealth , hope that is the case in a newly formed Andhra state.As for a T state ,it is a momentous time in T history where they would have the chance to rule themselves after a gap of 500+ years ( '48 to 56 was too short ..).Hope both the regions have a healthy competition flying the Telugu flags in all fronts of the country. |
| | Back to top |
|
 |
Artisan Telugu Bidda
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 106 Location: Hyderabad
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chaitanya & Ved,
Good to see a MAJOR trendshift in the posts.
The entire pattern of messages has changed drastically after Karimnagar election.
I met Mr. Madhu Yashki goud recently and he is updated on the important artciles posted on various sites including this one......
Get going............ |
| | Back to top |
|
 |
compustarsg
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:16 pm Post subject: in my opinion should be in basara |
|
|
| in my opinion should be in basara |
| | Back to top |
|
 |
Page 5 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | |

|
|
Make AndhraNews your home page.
© 2000-2008 Vijay Technologies. All Rights Reserved and are those of their respective Companies. Please note that posts that use abused words, that cause wrong propaganda, misleading information or information promoting business products etc, will be deleted by the admin and their accounts will be blocked. AndhraNews.com may also take legal action depending on the severity. |